Am 15. März 2019 00:19:22 MEZ schrieb althio <[email protected]>: >Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If this seems viable, I would expand the proposal by a migration >proposal from amenity=police to police=station >> >> I don’t think we should abandon amenity=police and it will likely not >happen unless people tag so many different things with the tag that it >becomes useless. My primary interest is in specifying the kind of >police and facility, a generic amenity=police on top of that does not >harm. If the new scheme becomes so widespread that every police station >also has a more specific police=* tag, we can still decide to remove >the amenity=police tags.
That sounds reasonable. So we'd keep amenity=police as the general indicator of police facilities and use police=* as a sub-tag to specify the type of facility. The current wiki page for amenity=police would consequently move to police=station and amenity=police would be reduced to indicate that the tag is used for all police facilities (and maybe hold a list of what's considered police by country). I'll adapt the proposal. >There is no need to abandon amenity=police for public facing police >stations. That, on the contrary, doesn't seem consequent to me. We'd end up with amenity=police and police=* as main tags for different types of police facilities. I fear that that would be confusing and cause inconsistent mapping. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
