Am 15. März 2019 09:17:31 MEZ schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: >Mar 15, 2019, 7:37 AM by [email protected]: > >> >> >> Am 15. März 2019 00:19:22 MEZ schrieb althio <> >[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >: >> >Martin Koppenhoefer <> [email protected] ><mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: >> >>>My primary interest is in specifying the kind of >>>police and facility, a generic amenity=police on top of that does not >>>harm. If the new scheme becomes so widespread that every police station >>>also has a more specific police=* tag, we can still decide to remove >>>the amenity=police tags. >> >> That sounds reasonable. So we'd keep amenity=police as the general >indicator of police facilities >> >Public-facing police facilities. For example police warehouse should >not be tagged with it >(and even if some are tagged this way I think that everybody would >consider it as a tagging >mistake).
I sense dissent here about the future use of amenity=police. Would it be a possible solution to keep amenity=police for public-facing police stations only, but invite mappers on the wiki to nevertheless add police=station, so that in the future the majority of police stations will hopefully also carry the police=station tag? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
