On 14/04/19 14:15, Phake Nick wrote:
area=no would also applies to amenity=park or landcover=* if you are tagging them in the same object.
If a were were tagged barrier=*, area=no A member of a relation as the outer way tagged amenity=park Would not the way be both then recognised as a) a barrier b) a park - that does not inherit the tags on the way. ????
在 2019年4月14日週日 05:16，Warin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 寫道：As a closed way would normally be taken as an area,but in the case of this barrier it is required not to be an area, why not use the tag area=no? Tag the unusual rather than the normal? Then, as Martin says, use the way of the barrier in a multipolygon relation for a park. On 14/04/19 06:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > >> On 13. Apr 2019, at 19:58, Shawn K. Quinn <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> It makes no sense to have to add separate ways for barrier=fence and >> leisure=park when the fence surrounds the entire park. > > you could make the park a multipolygon. > > > Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
