On 4/13/19 15:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > On 13. Apr 2019, at 19:58, Shawn K. Quinn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It makes no sense to have to add separate ways for barrier=fence and >> leisure=park when the fence surrounds the entire park. > > you could make the park a multipolygon.
This makes even less sense and is even clumsier, especially for those using iD if memory serves correctly. Single-member multipolygons are also a clear misuse of the multipolygon relation; the prefix "multi" means more than one. If, for some reason, the fence or the park boundary differ, I can see making one or both a multipolygon, but if they are the same then they should be tagged on the same way (at least as I see it). -- Shawn K. Quinn <[email protected]> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
