Le 23.05.19 à 23:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit : >> no main tag/value at all ? that avoid any bad tag/value :)
> Well, yes! What are they likely to be confused with? tagging a camp_pitch without any additional tag 'll be a polygon with no tag, that's a little light :) at least one tag is needed, camp_pitch=yes for example. Le 24.05.19 à 01:27, Warin a écrit : >> camp_site:part=camp_pitch is inconveniently long > A compromise? camp:part=pitch ??? but we lost : a part of what (link the part with the main tag) ? so camp_site:part=pitch if you wish to be short. well I fine with camp_site:part=pitch camp_site:part=camp_pitch camp_pitch=yes tourism=camp_pitch maybe the easiest is a single propal with the 3 choices, the choice that receives the most votes is approved. does anyone object to it because it's not a conventional proposal ? > Then pitch=caravan/trailer/tent/caravan;trailer no new tag needed for that, let's use the same tags as listed on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site you don't even need to include sub-tags in the proposal, so you don't have vote against them _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
