On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 01:50, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/06/19 08:50, Paul Allen wrote: > > hitching_point=dog|cat|horse|yes if you really feel a need to specify what > can or cannot be hitched > there. > > That was silly of me. It would be better to have hitching_point=post|rail|loop|hook|yes. And use hitching_point:for=dog|cat|horse with semicolon multiple values permitted.
People can add sub tags for the kind of animal, the construction, material, > capacity and any other detail if they wish. > hitching_point:capacity, hitching_point:material etc can be added later if really required. Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it will be a > little used item. > You're probably right there. Not much call for it. And unlikely to be rendered until we get vector carto, and maybe not even then. But, analogously to Internet Rule 34 (if it exists, there is porn of it, no exceptions): if it exists, somebody will want to map it. So let's standardize on a tag: to reduce the number of people creating ad hoc tags for it and to avoid somebody inventing a silly tag like landuse=dog_corral or tourism=dog_loop. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
