On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:11:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > 8 lip 2019, 03:22 od bradha...@fastmail.com: > > > wiki page > Can you link image of track > on rock/rocky surface where tagging > it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would > be misleading?
The existing grades seem to be UK-centric, and useful in this context. This discussion shows that they don't work well in some other places. Isn't the obvious solution to keep the existing numerical grades more or less unchanged, perhaps with a bit more clarification, but then introduce gradeA, gradeB, ... or whatever to cover other sorts of track? They might not even need to be ordered, although then the alphabetic choice might be less straightforward? ael _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
