9 lip 2019, 18:12 od [email protected]: > 80% of the time surface= is all you need. We could do with more and better > documented values for it, especially for clarity around gravel. I could see > some virtue in another tag to be used _only_ when surface= is also present, > documenting how well the surface is maintained, so that you could > differentiate between (say) potholey, broken-up asphalt and immaculately > maintained asphalt. > What about smoothness tag combined with surface=asphalt or paving_stones?
Is it also "die in fire" level of uselessness? I used smoothness tag in past to indicate horribly bad asphalt/paving stone alignments.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
