9 Jul 2019, 20:07 by [email protected]: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you link image of track >> on rock/rocky surface where tagging >> it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would >> be misleading? >> > > I'd have an easier time driving this grade5 (at least if that deadfall > were cleared) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14061129423 > (basically the natural surface, just brush clearance) or this grade4 > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041113235 (artificially graded, > but still native material) than this grade2 (compacted mixed gravel > and fines) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041171575. The last > one has worse rocks in spots than you see at that particular hairpin, > but I was concentrating on not trashing my Ford while driving over and > around them, and didn't photograph them. > > Surface material isn't everything. > > Interesting that all the pictures turned out to be from the same trip. > > If you want to use those images, let me know what license class I need > to downgrade to. > Unfortunately difference is not visible in images at all :( I thought about track on solid bare rock - that is clearly solid but, not something where tracktype=grade1 would be useful, or something else similar that would be clearly visible in images.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
