On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you link image of track > on rock/rocky surface where tagging > it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would > be misleading?
I'd have an easier time driving this grade5 (at least if that deadfall were cleared) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14061129423 (basically the natural surface, just brush clearance) or this grade4 https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041113235 (artificially graded, but still native material) than this grade2 (compacted mixed gravel and fines) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041171575. The last one has worse rocks in spots than you see at that particular hairpin, but I was concentrating on not trashing my Ford while driving over and around them, and didn't photograph them. Surface material isn't everything. Interesting that all the pictures turned out to be from the same trip. If you want to use those images, let me know what license class I need to downgrade to. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
