Is it ok for you to leave that discussion out of this proposal? Let's say: if it is decided that there is a route with additional sections verifiably belonging to the route, this role-set can be used in the route relation to indicate the purpose of the special sections.
Vr gr Peter Elderson Op do 21 mei 2020 om 16:03 schreef Andrew Harvey <[email protected]>: > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 22:49, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> May 21, 2020, 14:17 by [email protected]: >> >> It's still tricky. Around here, few trails are actually signposted; >> some don't have a sign anywhere! They're marked with paint blazes in >> the woods, guideposts in the fields, and cairns above the tree line. >> >> Not a native speaker, but I thought that paint blazes, >> guideposts, cairns, signs, surface markings, special traffic signs, >> information boards, markings by cutting on trees, ribbons, >> wooden poles etc all may be used to signpost a trail. >> >> Is "signposted" referring to only some specific methods of marking >> a trail? >> > > To me all those things tell me that someone else uses this track for > walking and I'm not too lost and reassures that I'm not just bush bashing > or following an animal trail. > > Critically those things say there is a trail here, but don't say where the > trail goes as part of a route, so in that case without knowing the exact > route, I don't see how it can be marked out as a recreational route. > > Though there was another thread recently about what constituents a route > vs just a named path.. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
