I personally think such should still be tagged as long as the space, or the right of way, still remain, but not when it have been completely removed, integrated into surrounding area, and redeveloped, unless traces or marks of either the remain of the rail system itself or the space previous used by the rail can still be found despite redevelopment.
在 2020年5月25日週一 13:06，Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> 寫道： > This was originally sent to the Talk mailing list, but it is better if it > is discussed on the Tagging mailing list: > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > I agree that razed, completely demolished railways, where all traces of > the former track-bed have been removed, should be removed from > OpenStreetMap. > > It is still considered acceptable to map abandoned railways, where the old > railway grade remains, even though the metal rails have been removed. > > However, note that there are some people who are very committed to mapping > historical and abandoned railways, so there may be resistance to removing > these features. > > See the long discussions about rendering railway=abandoned at > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542 and > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/586 for > example. > > Also see the previous discussion at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Railways#Abandoned_railways_where_all_evidence_has_been_removed > > – Joseph Eisenberg > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:40 PM Jack Armstrong <jacknst...@sprynet.com> > wrote: > >> Greetings. >> >> >> Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone (link >> below). These rails had been removed by our local mappers since they don’t >> exist anymore. Using the latest imagery (Maxar), you can see the rails have >> been completely removed from “Project 70”, a $1.2 billion Denver-area >> transportation corridor construction project. >> >> >> I think this mapper has good intentions, but what is the point of mapping >> something that does not exist? Doesn’t this clearly contradict the OSM Good >> Practice wiki in regards the sections, “Verifiability”, “Map what's on the >> ground” and “Don't map historic events and historic features”? The last >> section states, "*Do not map objects if they do not exist currently*." >> >> >> Should we tag (invisible) razed sidewalks? Should we leave (invisible) >> destroyed buildings in place, tag them as razed and then create new >> buildings on top of them? >> >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/39.78016/-104.94562 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> t...@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
