May 26, 2020, 12:52 by [email protected]: > 26 maj 2020 kl. 11:33 skrev Volker Schmidt <> [email protected]> >: > >> >> We have now been reviving the path discussion in 73 messages, and counting >> ... >> I still feel we are not understanding each other (or is it only me who is >> lost?) >> To me a highway=path is a concept that is well defined in the wiki, and the >> various types can be described with existing tags. >> > > The text and image at the top of > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path>> seems to indicate > that highway=path is mainly intended for more or less unprepared paths. Yet, > the examples at the bottom of the page show how to tag paved, signed, urban > foot- and cycleways. > Changed a bit in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:highway%3Dpath&diff=1995169&oldid=1993843 I have somewhere great photo for top image, with asphalt cycleway ending and turning into unpaved path. But I am unable to find it now. Has anybody got an such image with both paved and unpaved path on an open license? > And I am fairy sure I have seen people advocate that highway=footway and > =cycleway should be deprecated and replaced with =path plus various extra > tags. > I would support exact opposite move, though currently highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated seems to be standard.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
