Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even not ideal 
and
ask for a review.

"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.

May 26, 2020, 10:58 by vosc...@gmail.com:

> Please come back to my original question: > I would like to eliminate the 
> contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <> j...@liotier.org> > wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that              the 
>>>> JOSM style
>>>>  that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not              show 
>>>> ways
>>>>  properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a              
>>>> bug in the
>>>>  style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on          this.  If anything, it 
>>> gives validators more to work with if          you start doing something 
>>> weird.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to