So, should this contradiction be eliminated from the wiki or not?
Às 09:32 de 26/05/2020, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escreveu:
Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even not ideal and ask for a review. "Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored. May 26, 2020, 10:58 by vosc...@gmail.com: Please come back to my original question: /I would like to eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?/ On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org <mailto:j...@liotier.org>> wrote: On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the JOSM style that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show ways properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a bug in the style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes. I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If anything, it gives validators more to work with if you start doing something weird.Isn't that what oneway=no is for ? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
