在 2020年7月3日週五 22:32，Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> 寫道：
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 14:43, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > description=* might be a better way of dealing with it (if the name of >> the >> place doesn't give it away). >> >> No, that is a bad idea. The "description" field does not provide >> consistent data. It is always preferable to use a new, more specific tag. >> > > Description is a very good idea if you think that mapping things down to > that > level of detail is silly. If it concentrates on 79 flavours of coffee with > 200 different toppings but also sells one type of tea, map just > drink:coffee=yes. If you want people to know they can also get a bad > cup of tea there, with absolutely no choice, the description is fine. > > The problem with a tag to specify what kind of drink it focuses on > is that it breaks when the place focuses on two types of drink. What > if there is an incredible variety of teas and coffees but only one > flavour of juice? What if there are a lot of coffees and a lot of > juices but the tea comes from the cheapest tea bags > available that have long passed their shelf life? > > So now we need a tag that can handle multiple foci. OK, > semicolon-delimited list. But now it turns out that they > do a lot of types of coffee, a lot of types of tea, five flavours > of juice but only one flavour of carbonated drink? So now we > need a tag for an intermediate-level of focus. > > Ah, but some of the coffee is good coffee but some of it is bad > coffee. So now we need to tag the individual flavours of coffee > so we can specify a quality rating for them. > > This is getting very silly. > > Do they sell coffee? Yes or no. Do they sell tea? Yes or no. Do they > sell juice? Yes or no. Are there are large range of coffees? Goes in > the description. > > I don't mind micromapping, but I draw the line at picomapping. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > 在 2020年7月3日週五 22:32，Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> 寫道： > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 14:43, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > description=* might be a better way of dealing with it (if the name of >> the >> place doesn't give it away). >> >> No, that is a bad idea. The "description" field does not provide >> consistent data. It is always preferable to use a new, more specific tag. >> > > Description is a very good idea if you think that mapping things down to > that > level of detail is silly. If it concentrates on 79 flavours of coffee with > 200 different toppings but also sells one type of tea, map just > drink:coffee=yes. If you want people to know they can also get a bad > cup of tea there, with absolutely no choice, the description is fine. > > The problem with a tag to specify what kind of drink it focuses on > is that it breaks when the place focuses on two types of drink. What > if there is an incredible variety of teas and coffees but only one > flavour of juice? What if there are a lot of coffees and a lot of > juices but the tea comes from the cheapest tea bags > available that have long passed their shelf life? > > So now we need a tag that can handle multiple foci. OK, > semicolon-delimited list. But now it turns out that they > do a lot of types of coffee, a lot of types of tea, five flavours > of juice but only one flavour of carbonated drink? So now we > need a tag for an intermediate-level of focus. > > Ah, but some of the coffee is good coffee but some of it is bad > coffee. So now we need to tag the individual flavours of coffee > so we can specify a quality rating for them. > > This is getting very silly. > > Do they sell coffee? Yes or no. Do they sell tea? Yes or no. Do they > sell juice? Yes or no. Are there are large range of coffees? Goes in > the description. > > I don't mind micromapping, but I draw the line at picomapping. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > 在 2020年7月3日週五 22:32，Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> 寫道： > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 14:43, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > description=* might be a better way of dealing with it (if the name of >> the >> place doesn't give it away). >> >> No, that is a bad idea. The "description" field does not provide >> consistent data. It is always preferable to use a new, more specific tag. >> > > Description is a very good idea if you think that mapping things down to > that > level of detail is silly. If it concentrates on 79 flavours of coffee with > 200 different toppings but also sells one type of tea, map just > drink:coffee=yes. If you want people to know they can also get a bad > cup of tea there, with absolutely no choice, the description is fine. > > The problem with a tag to specify what kind of drink it focuses on > is that it breaks when the place focuses on two types of drink. What > if there is an incredible variety of teas and coffees but only one > flavour of juice? What if there are a lot of coffees and a lot of > juices but the tea comes from the cheapest tea bags > available that have long passed their shelf life? > > So now we need a tag that can handle multiple foci. OK, > semicolon-delimited list. But now it turns out that they > do a lot of types of coffee, a lot of types of tea, five flavours > of juice but only one flavour of carbonated drink? So now we > need a tag for an intermediate-level of focus. > > Ah, but some of the coffee is good coffee but some of it is bad > coffee. So now we need to tag the individual flavours of coffee > so we can specify a quality rating for them. > > This is getting very silly. > > Do they sell coffee? Yes or no. Do they sell tea? Yes or no. Do they > sell juice? Yes or no. Are there are large range of coffees? Goes in > the description. > > I don't mind micromapping, but I draw the line at picomapping. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging Saying bubble tea is "pico mapping" drinks is the same as saying mapping a cuisine=pizza is "pico mapping" bakery Please understand OpenStreetMaps is a world project and some feature, as well as distinction among them, are more prevalence in some regions than others. > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
