Mar 30, 2023, 16:11 by [email protected]: > Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit : > >> we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where >> there is one or more fuel pump. >> > > in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed > to designate all the pumps in the same location. > > it you really want to have an amenity to keep > the same idea as for fossil amenity, > why not amenity=charing_place > but keep the current in-use meaning amenity=charging_station inchanged > that would be far worse: break many data consumers and require retagging far more cases And would also redefine amenity=charging_station anyway >> And it also seems logical to use "man_made" category to tag the individual >> charge points as we do for fuel pumps. >> > > that doesn't answer my objection: don't change the meaning > of an existing tag : > For years we will end up with a tag with two meanings: the old and > the new and it will be impossible to review the old tag since part > of the new meaning (amenity=charging_station = a site of > man_made=charging_station) uses the same tag as the current meaning > (amenity=charging_station = a charging station, that may be part of > a bigger site) > not being able to migrate from the old to the new schema is the worst thing > you can do to destroy data quality > It is sufficient to review all cases with amenity=charging_station next to each other, which is doable and only tiny amount of cases will require on the ground checks
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
