There was a similar conversation in the Hungarian community as well. I
would like to ask what you think about such (and similar) official
bicycle route signs:
https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.4675022,18.8055463,3a,35.3y,85.25h,81.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_4lLYsjnTzP_R_swduneHg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.4653939,18.8056303,3a,16.7y,337.24h,87.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5KRYaFzRIWPFrMwQBrYf9g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
do they imply a bicycle=designated value for the road if it is not a
cycleway (because it is unnecessary for that), or is it enough to just
put the lcn/rcn etc. value on the road.
Thanks, Szem
2024.04.30. 09:09 keltezéssel, Martin Koppenhoefer írta:
sent from a phone
On 30 Apr 2024, at 08:51, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
wrote:
In fact, some bicycle trails are signed where
cycling is illegal
So does that then make it legal?
no, in Germany it also happens from time to time that we discover
signposted bicycle routes where cycling is legally forbidden, often
presumably because the signs are not “correct” (not what is intended),
and the legal conclusion from such a situation is you have to push the
bike on such sections. Route markers do not change legal accessibility
as defined by traffic signs.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
