Sorry Simon, I really didn't intend to make things more complicated. I just wanted to ensure someone else doesn't get caught in the future after thinking I was doing the right thing, and no one else has done this each time this has come up in the past.
I've made your suggested change to the page in regards to CC BY 4.0 datasets, I've also moved it to the bottom line of the section since that made sense. If we don't doubt the validity of the permission granted as you mentioned we obviously don't know internal government arrangements way back, then does that mean we'd allow people to continue using the DNRM (and others) CC BY 2.5 datasets? On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:17 PM Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2018 um 11:13 schrieb Simon Poole: > > > > Making clear that we don't the validity of the permission granted for the > CC BY 2.5 datasets, but don't extend it to covering the current ones and > avoid speculating on internal government arrangements way back. > > That should have been: > > .. that we don't doubt the validity .. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
