Yeap, this has already been covered before:

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Jonathon Rossi <> wrote:

>  The CC-BY 2.5 attribution was granted by the team not DNRM
> (or a former named department), so how relevant/legal do we think this is
> now that we know DNRM's position on the matter who are the actual copyright
> owner.
Talk-au mailing list

Reply via email to