On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 18:14, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rock overhangs (rock shelters) have been quite extensively mistagged in > Australia as natural=cave_entrance. > > Are there any objections to re-tagging these overhangs tagged as > natural=cave_entrance to amenity=shelter + shelter_type=rock_shelter? > No real objection, Andrew, but when (how deep) does a rock overhang / shelter become an actual cave? :-) Also noticed in the discussion comments on > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type > "Can you look if this could be tagged as a shelter ? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Champlitte,_%C3%A9craigne.jpg Tounoki <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tounoki&action=edit&redlink=1> (talk <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tounoki&action=edit&redlink=1>) 14:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC) If it is open to the public, not meant for sleeping, no cooking or heating equipement inside, then yes, you could use amenity <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=shelter <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter> +shelter <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter>=weather_shelter <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:shelter%3Dweather_shelter&action=edit&redlink=1> " Is "not meant for sleeping, no cooking or heating equipement inside" supposed to be a criteria for a shelter? Some of the overhangs I've seen are pitch black underneath from many thousands of years of cooking fires, & are acknowledged as places that Aboriginal peoples camped during bad weather - does that mean they're not shelters? (although I don't know what else they would then be?) Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
