I support natural=rock_overhang, or something similar. David
On 14 April 2019 10:14:44 pm AEST, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >Ok, thanks for the feedback. Let's gather some global thoughts on this, >I've posted >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-April/044554.html > >On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 16:23, Roger Browne <roger.bro...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> I've never been happy about "natural=cave_entrance", yet I have used >it >> several times because it seems to be the least bad of the tags >currently in >> use. >> >> The use of "amenity' is just wrong, because an amenity is something >that >> is provided for a purpose (such as a cafe, bicycle parking, a >charging >> station, a table, etc): >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity >> Furthermore, every other type of "shelter" has a >deliberately-constructed >> roof (hut, picnic shelter, changing shed, sunshade, etc). >> >> A rock overhang is something natural that just exists. To my mind it >> absolutely belongs under "natural". The ideal would simply be >> "natural=rock_overhang". A map should tell it like it is, and not >> complicate things by trying to "fit a square shelter_type into a >round >> amenity". >> >> Roger. >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
