I prefer to use separate ways for separate foot paths.
On 28 December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Andrew, >thanks for all these hints. I probably should have read up on the tags >a >bit better. A case of too late mapping. > >I've followed your suggestions and added the tags up and downstream of >the roundabout with this changeset >https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78947187 > >I do welcome comments. In particular regarding how to go about the >cycle >way and the roundabout. And what about sidewalk? I'm inclined to map it >as a separate way. > >Cheers, >Seb > >On 28/12/19 6:37 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> 1. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes is says "Use >> the lanes=* key to tag how many traffic lanes there are on a highway >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway>." and "Count excludes >> cycle lanes.". So in this case there are only 2 traffic lanes. So >> simply use: >> >> lanes=2 >> >> 2. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway it says >> "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway" Since both sides >> have a cyclelane you can just use a single tag: >> >> cycleway=lane >> >> Using both cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:right=lane can be >interpreted >> as the same thing, and some people would use cycleway:both=lane which >> also means the same thing. My preference is to keep things simple by >> using cycleway=lane since having 3 different ways of tagging the same >> thing just makes it harder for beginners to contribute because >they'll >> be left confused on the difference, whereas if we're consistent with >> the simplest form, it's best. >> >> 3. Once you've used lanes=2 then access:lanes, bicycle:lanes, >> cycleway:lanes are no longer needed here. >> >> 4. lcn=yes only if this is part of a signposted cycle route (ie. if >> there are way marking signs showing this is a route) >> >> 5. Parking lane tagging looks good, but again once you've used >lanes=2 >> then you don't need parking:lanes=lane|||||lane. >> >> 6. I'd also use cycleway:lane=doorzone to indicate this cyclelane is >> in the door zone and so mostly I'd just ride outside the cyclelane in >> the traffic lane anyway... The tag isn't well documented yet but has >> have some >> use https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway%3Alane=doorzone >> >> 7. You could also say surface=asphalt, lit=yes, overtaking=no if you >> wanted to add more tags. >> >> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 01:12, Sebastian Spiess <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm considering to add the following tags to Griffin Road (and >others) >> bit since JOSM is not rendering as I expect it, I thought I ask >if >> this >> combination makes even sense. >> >> Road example is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171171120 >and >> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1R1u3k4BQ6dsIscMwSfDpg >> >> The road is essentially parking lane, bike lane, 2 lane road, >bike >> lane, >> parking lane. Tag wise this leads me to: >> >> access:lanes=|no|||no| >> bicycle:lanes=|designated|||designated| >> cycleway:lanes=|lane|||lane| >> cycleway:left=lane >> cycleway:right=lane >> highway=secondary >> lanes=6 >> lcn=yes >> maxspeed=50 >> name=Griffin Road >> parking:condition:both=free >> parking:lane:both:parallel=on_street >> parking:lane:both=parallel >> parking:lanes=lane|||||lane >> >> what are your thoughts? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
