On 31/12/19 16:42, Ian Sergeant wrote:
IMO clearly no.
A router may even prefer to route around roundabouts and prefer a
route where cycling amenity is actually continuous. Map it how it is,
and the router can decide based on the preferences (weightings) of the
rider.
Ian.
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 8:05 am Sebastian S., <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my question was
rather from a continuity point of view.
The roads into and out of the round about have cycle lanes. The
cyclist needs to merge with the road traffic to pass through.
Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure
routing goes through it?
On 30 December 2019 6:56:31 am AEDT, Andrew Harvey
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then
you can just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout.
On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick,
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks
Graeme
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I prefer to use separate ways for separate foot paths.
As do I.
On 28 December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I do welcome comments. In particular regarding how
to go about the cycle way and the roundabout.
Looks OK to me, but I've also wondered how bike lanes are
supposed to work through roundabouts, when there's nothing
marked on the road?
For safety I think you will find all bicycle lanes end before any
roundabout and restart after the roundabout.. helps stop cars exiting
over cyclists, well it is supposed to...
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
