Message: 2 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS) Message-ID: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >Hi Folks, >Thanks for the great discussion on this issue. I have tried to summarise the discussion and it seems like there is some consensus around the following tagging >hiking_scale:awtgs= as the general tag for the grade of the WHOLE track as that is what is detailed in the AWTGS guidelines >and >source:hiking_scale:awtgs= for the source of the data with values such as >* source:hiking_scale:awtgs=user - Where a user has defined the grading >* source:hiking_scale:awtgs=operator - Where the grading has been applied by the operator of the track (and the operator should also be applied to the track) >* source:hiking_scale:awtgs=as_signed - Where the data has come from a sign located at the start of the track >There has also been some discussion on sections of track being graded as well. I think this needs further work as it doesn?t seem to match the guidelines and may also depend on how operators have defined the tracks >ie Is the Larapinta ?Track? all graded the same or are ?sections? rated differently? I know in the case of Tasmania the Overland Track that PWS has a single grading for the whole track but some other websites have >graded each ?section/days travel?. >There also needs to some further clarification if this goes on the ways or relations in regards to longer defined tracks with relations. >If we are close then I reckon an updated wiki with these values on both >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia/Walking_Tracks and >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Bush_Walk ing_and_Cycling_Tracks >Cheers - Phil That sounds great to me Phil (nearly ready for me to reapply my deleted tags). However, I'm not sure I understand the difference between your suggested sources "operator" and "as_signed". I suggested "as-signed", but surely the operator is the body that installs the signs - so wouldn't they normally mean the same thing ? regards Ian
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
