I'm also a Perth cyclist, and I think I pretty much agree with what
others have said. These routes should stay on the map if they're
signposted on the ground, but other than that I think they're often not
particularly great routes. I must admit that the cyclemap render now
(since the removal of these routes) actually looks a lot more like my
intuitive idea of what cycling looks like in Perth — i.e. there are some
good purpose-made paths along the freeways, and other than that there's
not much. With the official routes, it always looked like there was this
amazing cross-cutting network of cycleways, and actually that's not
really the case.
—Sam
On 11/2/22 13:44, [email protected] wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 01:11:54 +1000
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging
Guidelines has been changed by Aaronsta
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Well, he has answered a changeset comment:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116656873
I'll leave it to the WA OSM community if that's a valid reason to simply
delete
a whole bunch of routes for which there definitely are signs on the
ground,
and what to do about it.
I am from Perth, and am a cyclist. I agree with aaronsta that these routes
are pretty useless. I have often looked at the signage and wondered about
OSM & the usefulness of the routes. I might not have gone to the extent of
deleting them, but it is probably the right thing to do (they are
pretty-much obsolete and I doubt if anyone uses them)
Ian
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
