Interesting discussion; it does seem like the consensus is landing on
the side of service=pipestem.
There are 668 instances of driveway=pipestem in Australia:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gU6, but there is 0 instances of
service=pipestem: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gUd. However, it seems as
though I have had a disproportionate influence (509 of driveway=pipestem
were last edited by me https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gUf)
I don't have a strong preference either way, so I'm happy to move over
to the service=pipestem structure (possibly through bulk edit?)
Dian
On 2022-03-16 08:53, Andrew Harvey wrote:
In the global community it's still disputed, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems
and my proposal to have this as an editor preset
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/239 where the
tagging question is still not resolved.
I've actually come around to the idea that service=pipstem is better,
rational being that service=driveway is very clearly defined on the
wiki as a non-shared driveway leading to a single residence. I think
it's best we leave that intact and have a sibling tag service=pipestem
for shared driveways. Otherwise you'll need to redefine
service=driveway to be any type of shared or non-shared driveway and
add a new tag driveway=single to most existing highway=service.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 08:10, Tom Brennan <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think I started the last discussion on this, so I'll wade in!
Driveways are a bit of a nightmare - there are lots that don't fit
neatly into one bucket or another.
We did agree that service=driveway, driveway=pipestem was better than
service=pipestem.
It's probably 6 of one, half a dozen of the other as to whether the
ones
below are all shared driveways. Some could equally be classified as
private residential roads.
But they could all do with a clean up, one way or the other!
cheers
Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 15/03/2022 9:22 pm, Dian Ågesson wrote:
Hi Seb!
The last time this came up on the mailing list
(https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-September/015014.html)
most people seemed to approve of the following mapping:
highway=service
service=driveway
driveway=pipestem
Dian
On 2022-03-15 20:16, Sebastian Azagra via Talk-au wrote:
Hi all,
Had a query regarding the mapping of driveways / shared driveways
as
there seems to be quite a number of different approaches in the
data.
Below are three examples of similar ways that have different tags
used
in each instance.
Highway=service
Service= driveway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/818426144
Highway=Residential
Service= driveway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184844142#map=18/-38.00126/145.27585
Highway=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429541974
Reading the OSM wiki, none of these ways are correctly mapped as
they
are all shared driveways that leads from a road. my understanding
that
they need to be tagged as follows:
Highway=service
Service= Pipestem
Would be interested in knowing your thoughts.
regards,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
