Hi Phil,

I think you are getting to the real question...

So I did some checking and the charging invoice from Tesla does not give any 
REF or Name. It simply states the address.
The map in the car and on the phone gives ' Tesla Supercharger Hollydene, NSW' 
in bold as the identification token (trying to avoid using ame here).

For me as an user I want to find this charger when I search for it. I want to 
see the full token to easily distinguish between several chargers. I also would 
be happy to see the token on a rendered map.

Weather the text is in the REF or NAME tag I don't care.

I do think the chargers should also have tags for address details, plug , 
access and cost, network, operator and brand details. We are allowed to dream 
right?

So back to the real question. Is the argument that 
' Tesla Supercharger Hollydene, NSW' is not a name and should not be used as a 
single text string? Or should the text string simply not be a NAME tag and 
instead a REF tag?

Or lastly is the expectation that data consumers 'construct' the information 
from other tags? For the last point I think it is a great idea but unrealistic 
see my ' Tesla Supercharger Central Coast NSW' example where the city=Tuggerah.

I'm happy to use REF if this is the majority preference.

Cheers Seb

On 15 December 2022 11:07:47 pm AEDT, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com> wrote:
>Hi Sebastian,
>
> 
>
>I suppose for me it’s a question of should OSM hold a name which can be made 
>from other attributes and does it fit with the name and charging wikis?
>
> 
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
>
> 
>
>Do tesla chargers/charge areas also have reference numbers like other 
>networks? This usually goes in the ref key.
>
> 
>
>I suspect many of these are ‘named’ simply so they get a label in the carto 
>map without people realising that the operator and ref are used for labelling 
>charging stations in that map instance. 
>
> 
>
>Other apps may well use other OSM attributes.
>
> 
>
>Some interesting ‘name’ insights in this post as well
>
> 
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/397565
>
> 
>
>Cheers – Phil
>
> 
>
>From: Sebastian S. <mapp...@consebt.de> 
>Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2022 10:34 PM
>To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com>; 'Warin' 
><61sundow...@gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [talk-au] 'Named' EV chargers
>
> 
>
>Hello all,
>
>As an EV driver I think that some charge stations have names.
>
>I do agree that 'Tesla Supercharger ' is not a name with much value. Tesla has 
>names in their app for these charging stations, e.g. 'Tesla Supercharger 
>Hollydene, NSW' or 'Tesla Supercharger Central Coast, NSW'. For the latter the 
>name is not the same as the address which is one of my key reasons to have the 
>name tag, full length.
>
>Aside from the Tesla supercharger there will be other large high current or DC 
>charging stations that in my view warrant a name. Mainly because the are or 
>will be key stopover points that people will navigate to.
>
>But I'm also of the opinion that the name of the Woolworths in Dee Why is ' 
>Woolworths Dee Why '
>
>Seb
>
>On 15 December 2022 8:23:19 pm AEDT, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com 
><mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
>
>Thanks Warin,
>
> 
>
>Its pretty obvious that most are not real names but actually descriptions or 
>operators/networks and locations
>
> 
>
>https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1p4N
>
> 
>
>Cheers - Phil
>
> 
>
> 
>
>From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com> > 
>Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2022 8:00 PM
>To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> 
>Subject: Re: [talk-au] 'Named' EV chargers
>
> 
>
> 
>
>On 15/12/22 17:11, Ben Kelley wrote:
>
>My thoughts:
>
> 
>
>I wouldn't remove the names. It's a big call to say that this thing definitely 
>does not have a name, when someone else says it does, especially if 50% have a 
>name.
>
> 
>
>"Tesla supercharger" is not an individual name, probably a brand. And there 
>would be many that have that "name" in the world. It would be like tagging 
>some petrol stations with 'name=Shell'. 
>
>The easiest thing to do is change the key 'name' to 'description', that way 
>OSM looses no information. 
>
>Then add tags for brand/operator/ref/*. 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> - Ben.
>
> 
>
>On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 14:24, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com 
><mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
>
>Hi Folks,
>
> 
>
>Thoughts on 'named' EV chargers? Around 50% of chargers in Oz have some 'name'.
>
> 
>
>Most look to be adding the either the location or name of the operator etc (ie 
>Freds Shop, XYZ carpark, Tesla supercharger etc), I suspect so it gets 
>rendered on the map. 
>
> 
>
>Are folks happy if I remove the names. I will ensure that no details are lost 
>by making sure any operator or network details gets added to the correct tags.
>
> 
>
>(I will also post to Oceania Forum and Discord)
>
> 
>
>[Overpass query](https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1p4u)
>
> 
>
>Cheers - Phil
>
> 
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-au mailing list
>Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> 
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to