Hallo Martijn, I just picked a random exit node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31247369
it has the following tags: exit_to=Turnhout, Kasterlee highway=motorway_junction name=Turnhout-Centrum ref=24 Unfortunately, this is not typical for Belgium. I also checked some junctions around Antwerp (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5bG ) , none of them has an "exit_to". The name and ref are what we use for all our exits. They all have a number and a name. During my lanes/turn:lanes editing in Flandres, I've encountered a handful of cases where there is a destination on the motorway_link (the exit). Furthermore we do not have a lot of "destination" tags, that is why Johan proposed to help us, based on some images he took. He would tag the destinations as in The Netherlands, so with a destination and destination:ref tag. Perhaps even with the destination:symbol extension. André's example was for an entrance to a motorway, not an exit (if I'm not mistaken). I assume we have even less (destination) data there. None of the keys is used really much: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/destination/destination:forward/destination:backward/exit_to but based on the fact that there is some growing support for destination in the US (pushed by you guys I understand), I would prefer to use destination. regards m On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: > Just FYI - in the U.S. we have been moving from the (deprecated) > exit_to= on the motorway_junction node to tagging the destinations on > the _link ways using destination= and destination:ref=. For the exit > numbers, we keep it simple and use ref= on the motorway_junction node. > This is also what the Scout app supports for the US (even though it > also looks at exit_to= because there is still so many of those left). > Note that this is just for the exits, not for the main roadways. > > See also my diary entry at > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/22419 > > The wiki has a lot of partially contradictory tagging proposals, but I > feel that the combination of destination / destination:ref on the > _link and ref on the motorway_junction node is the simplest convention > that covers all bases. > > Did you end up with a 'definitive' way of doing it in Belgium / NL > yet? Have you looked at common practice in surrounding countries? > > Thanks / Martijn > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > > No problem. we can use a similar Overpass query to locate the ones > without > > destination:ref > > > > > > regards > > > > m > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ben Laenen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday 25 September 2014 07:05:29 Marc Gemis wrote: > >> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:08 AM, André Pirard < > [email protected]> > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > I added destination:ref=E25 on a link and Osmand kept silent while > >> > > going > >> > > onto it. > >> > > I added ref=E25 on the next link and Osmand said "turn right onto > >> > > E25". > >> > > > >> > > So, I recommend the latter. > >> > > >> > If we agree on this, it is pretty easy to write an Overpass Query to > >> > locate > >> > all those motorway links and add the refs systematically. > >> > Just let me know if there are any objections to André's proposal, > >> > otherwise > >> > I'll start adding them. > >> > >> Yeah, I object. Again, it's not the ref of the link, which is usually in > >> the > >> form of A.001.123, which we don't map currently. Routers should just > >> become > >> smarter and understand the tags like destination:ref. File a bug report > >> over > >> there. > >> > >> Greetings, > >> Ben > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-be mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-be mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > > -- > Martijn van Exel > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
