On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Glenn Plas <[email protected]> wrote: >> * splitting a building because the garage is clearly separated on AGIV >> imagery > > You should not have to do that imho, I've never encountered this 'too > much building in between' situation. When the garage is separated > visibly on sat images but not in GRB, that's a precarious case, it could > be that the building has been replaced but GRB isn't up to date, it > could also be that the sat pics used are out of date and there has been > an additional construction already in GRB. You can't tell now what is > correct from combining al sources of information.
It's in Kaprijke, oid 1964089 IMHO this is just sloppy work in GRB. For those without access to GRB https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/Screenshots/Screenshots-1/i-JS8qrcz https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/Screenshots/Screenshots-1/i-74hZpVR _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
