It's up to the mapper that does the import to check each building individually. It's not different than noticing that a building is partly destroyed on the AGIV imagery and adapting the GRB building according to that.
m On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Ruben Maes <[email protected]> wrote: > Sunday 24 January 2016 19:03:35, Glenn Plas: >> (...) >> In the whole of Stekene, I probably deleted no more than 20 buildings >> on multiple thousands that got imported with good reasons. Deleting >> is not an issue. >> (...) >> Tag migration and merging takes more time than replaceing the geometry >> itself. Every time the merge conflict dialog pops up, you'll loose 15 >> seconds, multiply that by thousands of buildings... >> (...) > > I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in the GRB. I'm > thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB building shape is just > wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not perfect, it's a complex building) and > 3D mapped. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.18741/3.20325 > > -- > This message is OpenPGP signed. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
