What's the planning for the import ? * Glenn finishes documentation (although I think it's (almost) ready) * We pass this somehow through the import mailing list ( I fear we cannot avoid this). Sander, you have some experience with this. What do you think ? * We have a face-to-face meeting / hangout to explain the procedure to interested people. Face-to-face is better I think, but might not be feasible for everyone. Perhaps a combination ? * We start "the import". Somehow we need an overview for this to see who is working on a certain town. (a shared document/spreadsheet)
m. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Glenn Plas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in >> the GRB. I'm thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB >> building shape is just wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not >> perfect, it's a complex building) and 3D mapped. >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.18741/3.20325 > > Yes of course. that's why I call it a merge. since this process > encompasses using AGIV sat layer, and GRB layer in JOSM itself, it's > not hard to see where GRB has got it wrong. > > No need to worry about losing good OSM data, when done right.. > > Glenn > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
