Hi,

Recently an user mapped a set of disappeared “communal” or "vicinal” ways. By 
disappeared I mean they are physically absolutely not existent on the ground. 
They were either plowed or constructions were built right on them.

I believe it goes against the general rule that states that one might only map 
what’s visible on the field. Additionally the mapping itself was poorly done 
and the source mentioned was not relevant.

Using the tag [ 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility>trail]_visibility 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility>=no 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:trail_visibility%3Dno&action=edit&redlink=1>
 is not an option here since the user decided to map a unmaintained track road 
(with width = 4m !) that doesn’t offer such option.

He denied reverting the changeset, arguing that mapping those paths was a way 
to put pressure on the Commune and the owner in a discussion about the openness 
and accessibility of surrounding paths for the general public. He promised to 
delete the date once the case will be closed.

> Les sentiers et chemins que j'ai repris sur OSM sont légalement toujours 
> existants et personne n'est en droit d'empêcher quiconque de les utiliser, de 
> les réhabiliter ou de les débroussailler... c'est une façon de mettre la 
> pression sur le riverain... dès que des alternatives auront été créées et un 
> bon accord conclu, j'effacerai les données au profit des alternatives qui 
> auront été proposées.

The changesets : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927383
 
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927383>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927894
 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927894>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927825 
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927825>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927566 
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88927566>


What do you think ? I believe that’s not a good way of doing things (I don’t 
believe in maptivism in this situation) but can’t really find a clear position 
of the community about this particular case.

I don’t want to start a fight with that user because he’s really doing a great 
job at preserving the right of use of those heritage vicinal ways by 
confronting the Communes against those unfair owners. I would like to show him 
some string arguments to explain him why his initiative is not good for the 
community (If that’s the case).

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. 
        
Matthieu Gaillet

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to