In the cases where we have all three and they are identical.  Seems better to have the three merged.   In any case good to know.  I'll start removing them on import.

On 23/09/10 10:00 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
Bonjour Michael,

2010-08-16 11:54 [Talk-ca] Canvec.osm Product - Running!
I wrote  "natural=land  area features are a duplicate of natural=water inner polygon. It will be removed for the next release.  Point features will still be there."  

I understand that natural=land has priority in the rendering. Rendering will then "move" any overlapping features "under" the natural=land feature. It means you are better remove natural=land area before importing.

The standard case for an island is 
- an inner component of a relation type=multipolygon : natural=water
- a polygon : natural=land
- a polygon : natural=wood

Remove the polygon natural=land and the polygon natural=wood will render properly  in the hole created by the inner component of the natural=water multipolygon.

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of G. Michael Carter
Sent: September 23, 2010 09:09
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap; [email protected]
Subject: [Talk-ca] Sinking islands...


  I was importing data in the Georgian Bay area and I noticed 
something.   If an island is natural=land it renders in mapnik as white, 
regardless of the outer multipolygon.   if you have natrual=wood or 
possibly others, it sinks if it's not role=inner.

This is at least what I've observed so far.   It's rather hard to figure 
out when the mapnik tiles get cached and don't refresh in a timely fashion. :-)





_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F: 1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to