On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote:
> Most of the Canadian data that needs cleaning is very low impact. > > Two of the high-volume decline accounts are primarily imports that > have not been subsequently edited. That means the effected data can > easily be re-imported for a net-zero change. > > I recommend that we remove that data now, without delay. That will > simplify current cleanup activities by: > - removing trivial doomed data > - making interesting data cleaning opportunities easier to see > > I'd like to request that the data working group purge that data for > us. What do you think about requesting the removal of objects that > are: > > - created by the known-bad accounts > - version 1 (that is, they have not been modified by another mapper) > - not ways tagged natural=coastline > > That will reduce the cleanup in Canada by about an order of magnitude > with zero negative effect. > Could the impacted objects have an attributed added to them so we can easily review the impact before they're deleted? Could help us plan replacement strategies. --G
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
