> Objects edited only by those two non-agreed accounts, regardless of > the current version number. (Provided these objects are not > natural=coastline objects.) That will remove a number of objects that > were imported by one of these accounts and then modified by the other. > That should clear up another nice chunk of data. > I'd also like to request that DWG remove or revert all of the edits by > another account that has not agreed. This one has made unusual edits, > and the user disappeared when questioned about the source of the > information. > This is a cleanup job that nobody has tackled so far. We might as > well do it now. Removing this data will clear another 18% of tainted > nodes, 23% of tainted highways and 19% of other tainted ways. > Thoughts?
I'm all for removing tainted data automatically. It ends up being a pain and can often hamper remapping efforts. I've been remapping some areas of Winnipeg from a non-agree who imported from a questionable source. Still plenty of work to do though. Tyler _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca