> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 5:56 PM > To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> > wrote: > >> The first pass on the clean up started a few hours ago. > > > > It's complete now. > > The summary of the bulk removal is as follows: > > About 66% of the nodes, 70% of the highways, and 80% of the other ways > created by these accounts were removed. That's roughly 45% of all > tainted nodes, 17% of all tainted highways and 71% of all other tainted > ways. > > Since the removal, a number of undecided account have been contacted and > have agreed to the new terms. 14 of the top 22 non-agreed accounts have > now agreed. That is great news. > > I suggest that we can have more tainted data removed automatically, so > that we can concentrate our remapping efforts on areas that can benefit > from human intervention. I'd like to ask DWG to remove: > > Objects edited only by those two non-agreed accounts, regardless of the > current version number. (Provided these objects are not > natural=coastline objects.) That will remove a number of objects that > were imported by one of these accounts and then modified by the other. > > That should clear up another nice chunk of data. > > I'd also like to request that DWG remove or revert all of the edits by > another account that has not agreed. This one has made unusual edits, > and the user disappeared when questioned about the source of the > information. > > This is a cleanup job that nobody has tackled so far. We might as well > do it now. Removing this data will clear another 18% of tainted nodes, > 23% of tainted highways and 19% of other tainted ways. > > Thoughts?
It appears that the bot is deleting ways more extensive than those proposed. See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/26944782/history, which did not meet the criteria proposed. Also, it seems to of deleted the ways and left untagged nodes behind. I can run a stray node cleanup later, but can we review the logic used to remove these objects before any more are done? _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
