> From: Richard Weait [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:42 AM > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I suggest that we can have more tainted data removed automatically, > > > It appears that the bot is deleting ways more extensive than those > proposed. > > Ah, that's my fault. I miss-stated the scope when I requested the > removal. The result will be the equivalent of the automated cleanup > after the license change, for those three accounts. I'm inclined to > have it continue; this is making remapping faster / easier. Apologies > for my confusing the issue. > > Last time, some nodes were cleaned up after the ways were removed. I > expect this will be similar. > > Best regards, > Richard
I'm not sure what the best way to proceed. Proceeding with the node removals will still leave stray nodes as I believe there are false negatives in the license change algorithms used. When I suggested a second run targeting items where all versions were created by one of the accounts it was because the first run had essentially missed some objects. What might be best is reverting the deletion of objects that do not meet the proposed critera, so that we can then carry on normal remapping. Alternately, reverting the deletion of objects that are not imports or imports of highway=secondary or above which would then allow manual remapping to ensure continuity of the major roads network. Proceeding with an automated node removal and including nodes that are members of other objects could leave invalid geometries behind. I know I had to manually check for these when removing imports prior to remapping. The same applies to way removal and including ways that are members of relations. _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
