>From Rps333 in changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42876740:
This is part of the Stats Canada Open data project. And has been discussed on Talk:ca It has received OSM Ottawa community approval. OSM Ottawa has been planning on adding the build for 3 months now. We have a dedicated Task sever. FYI, every building I added, I have tried to confirm with Bing imagery if it makes sense. If there was a build there pick the best outline City of Ottawa or Bing/ NRCan data. I have also tried to move the address points to inside the building. Ref the missing building levels. I copied the new outline to the school multipolygon and must have missed coping the building level. My mistake. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Stewart C. Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-10-17 03:33 PM, James wrote: > > Stewart, that's where you are wrong. Ottawa has supplied data(footprints > > and address) to Stats Can to import into OSM for their project under the > > Canada Open Gov License so there would be no issues with licensing. > > > > We are using that data. > > You have not confirmed to this list here that the third-party clearance > requirement of the data has been met. This is required for any OGL data: > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2013- > November/005906.html > > You are not doing this as part of the Stats Canada import, as no go > ahead, discussion or agreement has been made here. Where is the Stats > Canada Ottawa data published, please? > > You are doing these imports under your own user names. You *know* that > this is against the guidelines. You've received two blocks already. > Please stop. > > Stewart > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
