>Having some time on my hands at the moment, I'm trying to get my head 
round some of the inconsistencies/duplications/gaps in the usage of the 
>highway key. Having looked at the recent widescale adoption of 
"highway=path" in Germany it is clearly fulfilling a need. I'm coming to 
the view that >this is a need that we (England and Wales) didn't know 
existed, because we're used to red dotted lines for country footpaths, and 
have fallen into >using the same tag for rural and urban footpaths, even 
though they are generally physically quite different. We've therefore lost 
some of the physical >information you get on OS maps, where old hands know 
to prefer footpaths that follow tracks etc.

This relates to my plans for Freemap/OpenFootMap, which specifically 
targets walkers. My current rendering plans are to render two layers: 
firstly a lower layer representing physical surface, which would be a 
dashed black line with small dashes for highway=footway,bridleway,cycleway 
or path, and large dashes for highway=track. (highway=path is probably 
more correct for paths in my view, but less used in practice, so my Mapnik 
rules will treat footway, bridleway, cycleway and path equivalently).

Overlaid on this would be a separate, transparent layer, for the actual 
rights, as opposed to the physical surface, which would use the 
designation tag to determine what actual legal right of way it is, and 
display public footpaths, bridleways and byways in different colours. I 
also plan to use designation=permissive_footpath (a footpath with known or 
implied permissive rights) in addition to the legal rights of way, in 
order to show known permissive paths. Finally this top layer would include 
a colour code for tracks known to be private (access=private), probably 
red.

Rights of way not physically evident on the ground could miss out the 
highway tag altogether, and just have designation=whatever.

This way we get the physical condition shown on OS maps, but also much 
better indication of where you can actually go than the OS maps, which 
typically do not distinguish between permissive and private tracks, a huge 
disadvantage for route planning.

You'll see more of this in practice once I've done a load of 
designation=XXX tagging in my neck of the woods (at present only paths 
I've surveyed in the past 6 weeks or so have it) which should make it to 
next Wednesday's planet.

Nick

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to