Tom,

>Nick, we do indeed, and I agree the original tagging has its flaws.

>The  question Richard posed is simply whether it's premature to suggest that  
>the newer proposal should be >documented as the appropriate schema.

Just to clarify I was not responsible for calling that page "UK recommended 
tagging", or whatever: someone else created that page using an old page of mine 
(and others) as a basis. I'd agree it shouldn't have such an authoritative 
title.

Nick

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to