I think foot=designated should *only* be used where you have definite evidence of a pedestrian right of way.
Tagging it on any old footway you happen to spot from Bing imagery (or even wander down when surveying) strips it of all useful meaning, and we'll have to find another tag to indicate rights of way. It appears this may have already happened. Or am I confusing foot=designated with designation=public_footpath? The latter is what I have used until now for public footpaths, and seems unambiguous enough that it won't get tagged on everything indiscriminately. -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
