>On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: >> On 1 March 2011 14:00, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk> wrote: >>> At risk of opening this discussion again ... You do need some way to >>> distinguish between official and unofficial rights of way though. >> >> Nick, we do indeed, and I agree the original tagging has its flaws.
>designation=* is now standing at 22000 uses, >highway=path+foot=designated at 5500 uses >Not quite settled, but bubbling along nicely. Which is good. I've got no issues with designation - I use it myself and Freemap uses it (and it only) to render rights of way. Nick Richard -----Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- To: Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> From: Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com> Date: 01/03/2011 02:24PM Cc: Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk>, talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Wiki - United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: > On 1 March 2011 14:00, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk> wrote: >> At risk of opening this discussion again ... You do need some way to >> distinguish between official and unofficial rights of way though. > > Nick, we do indeed, and I agree the original tagging has its flaws. designation=* is now standing at 22000 uses, highway=path+foot=designated at 5500 uses Not quite settled, but bubbling along nicely. Richard
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
