>On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Tom Chance <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1 March 2011 14:00, Nick Whitelegg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> At risk of opening this discussion again ... You do need some way to >>> distinguish between official and unofficial rights of way though. >> >> Nick, we do indeed, and I agree the original tagging has its flaws.
>designation=* is now standing at 22000 uses, >highway=path+foot=designated at 5500 uses >Not quite settled, but bubbling along nicely. Which is good. I've got no issues with designation - I use it myself and Freemap uses it (and it only) to render rights of way. Nick Richard -----Richard Mann <[email protected]> wrote: ----- To: Tom Chance <[email protected]> From: Richard Mann <[email protected]> Date: 01/03/2011 02:24PM Cc: Nick Whitelegg <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Wiki - United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Tom Chance <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 March 2011 14:00, Nick Whitelegg <[email protected]> wrote: >> At risk of opening this discussion again ... You do need some way to >> distinguish between official and unofficial rights of way though. > > Nick, we do indeed, and I agree the original tagging has its flaws. designation=* is now standing at 22000 uses, highway=path+foot=designated at 5500 uses Not quite settled, but bubbling along nicely. Richard
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
