>I think foot=designated should *only* be used where you have definite evidence >of a pedestrian right of way.
>Or am I confusing foot=designated with designation=public_footpath? The latter >is what I have used until now for public footpaths, and seems unambiguous >enough >that it won't get tagged on everything indiscriminately. designation=public_footpath has, from what I can make out, largely replaced its "deprecated" (maybe a bit strong a term) predecessor foot=designated. General current practice appears to be to use designation (less ambiguous as you say, and less tags needed to describe the different ROW types). Agree absolutely *it should only be used if you know for sure it's a right of way, or it appears to be beyond all reasonable doubt*. Nick
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
