On 24 March 2011 16:08, Luke Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Good points there - that description is pretty useless without a map to go > with it. > > Previously, I would have argued that in some cases the fact there was a > right of way was important. It's common to see a PRoW on a map that follows > a perfectly straight line across moorland. >
Dartmoor has some of these rights of way without any actual path on the ground. I wouldn't want to see these in OSM unless they could somehow be marked as non-navigable and rendered suitably. I've always taken the view that, especially in the open access areas, what's on the ground should be mapped. Kevin
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
