Also meant to add to my last email. Has anyone been in touch with tintin2873?
Cheers Chris On Tue, 10 May 2016 at 23:15 <m...@chrisfleming.org> wrote: > On 10/05/16 at 08:59pm, Eric Grosso wrote: > > I removed the NCN names associated to the roads/paths in Edinburgh (at > > least until the City By-pass) modified this week-end and I also re-added > > the railway=abandoned parts as it was before tintin2873's edits -- > > changeset #39226002. > > > > I discovered that some parts of the Union Canal Towpath and the Water of > > Leith Walkway are mapped as highway=path, some others as > highway=cycleway. > > tintin2873 changed all of these highways in cycleways (tagged previously > as > > paths). Despite the fact that these highways became part of the NCN, I > > still consider that these highways are still primarily paths by nature. > > Think parts of the towpath are debatable, but given the narrow width and > shared use. path with designanated bicycle is probably most correct. > > > > What do you think? Do we, OSM contributors, tag all the highways part of > a > > NCN as cycleways? What to do when in some cases, a highway is both part > of > > a NCN route and a hiking route (e.g the John Muir Way)? > > I think it depends of the width of the path and likelyhood of being > shared, needing to slow down for pedestrians. On a cycleway, it should > not normally be necessary to reduce speed to pass. > > Cheers > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
