I think all these measurements are a great idea but in the first instance for the taginfo script I think fhrs:id is sufficient. At least we'll know that is a direct response to our QP. Postcode data I think is a little more tricky than a raw count of objects tagged with addr=postcode. For longterm purposes it would be great to get a count of unique, correctly formatted postcodes, perhaps heatmapped onto Robert Whitakker's postcode map template
On 2 October 2016 at 17:38, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < [email protected]> wrote: > On 2 October 2016 at 15:38, Rob Nickerson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Which tags would you like me to set up a tag-info script for? We can then > > track these throughout the quarter. > > Off the top of my head, I'd have thought it would be good to know > about number of instances of fhrs:id=* and addr:postcode=*, and > numbers of eating type places (perhaps just one count for all > amenity=cafe|restaurant|fast_food|pub|bar). Maybe also the > number/proportion of such places that have a name tag. Possibly you > could do other measures postcode progress, such as number of unique > correctly-formatted postcodes in addr:postcode tags and/or number of > postcode sectors ("AB12 X..") with at least one addr:postcode tagged. > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
