A route would be marked trunk if it serves two large cities (see list on proposal page) or metro areas. Some trunk routings with ferry segments under the proposal follow Nautical Highway routes. I have marked Route 505 (Arnaldo Boulevard and Baybay in Roxas City) as trunk in the present and future schemes, but if you're suggesting trunk routings with a ferry segment should have multiple scheduled trips every day or the ferry leaving full, which is not the case here due to long trip length (Batangas-Roxas direct being ~17 hours long), then I can drop that in favor of the Mindoro and Caticlan routing. Would also like to note this with the Central Nautical Highway routing (Legazpi-Pilar-Aroroy-Masbate City-Cataingan-Bogo-Cebu City-Tubigon-Jagna-Camiguin-Balingoan). While the Cebu-Legazpi legs of this route, currently tagged trunk, provides a shortcut to the usual routing between the two cities via Eastern Visayas, the Cataingan-Bogo leg has infrequent ferry service, and the Masbate segments downgraded to primary (the Cebu-Bogo legs would remain trunk as it connects with the Bogo-Palompon ferry that forms the Cebu-Ormoc trunk routing); same goes with the Cebu-Bohol-Camiguin-Balingoan legs, which have been long tagged primary.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:45 AM Timeo Gut <timeo....@hotmail.com> wrote: > I also think that there should be no classification gaps for major routes. > > But it might be good to define some criteria as for what qualifies as > major. I'd like to suggest to only apply this to ferries that have either > continuous service (ferry leaves whenever full) or at least multiple > scheduled trips every day. > > Best Regards, > Timmy >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
