It's probably better if someone else answers to the tagging suggestion, but please note that it's "Norra", not "Nörra", and "uppgången" should be spelled with two p's.
/Andreas On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel < [email protected]> wrote: > (Sorry for not writing in Swedish to the list but my Swedish is probably > much worse than your English.) > > Hello all, > > I live in Malmö and I have done some improvements on Triangeln Station > which I believe align better with the "new" public transport feature > approved in late 2011, but before I upload my changes I would like to > hear the opinion from some other fellow OSMers who live nearby and know > the station. > > The way Triangeln was mapped before the proposed change was that there > were two buildings, both marked as a train station, which had the same > name. This is a bit misleading since there are not two Triangeln > stations; Triangeln is a single underground station that happens to have > two separate entrances via two separate buildings. To better reflect > reality, I mapped Triangeln as a single underground (layer=-2, same as > the platforms) area marked as public_transport=station (and also > railway=station for maximum compatibility) where platforms and the > buildings are contained within. The two buildings where the entrances > are still keep the name "Triangeln Station" but are now marked as > building=train_station (and *not* railway=station). Within each > building, just at the beginning of the stairs, there is a node tagged > with railway=subway_entrance (which besides the name should be > applicable to any underground train station) and each node has the name > "Nörra upgången" and "Södra uppgången". > > All these new elements are also part of the existing "Triangeln" > relation tagged as public_transport=stop_area. (I'm not really sure if > the Triangeln bus stop and the Triangeln train station should really be > part of the a single stop_area or not, but that's a separate discussion > and I kept the existing relation where both are a single area.) > > If you want to see the new Triangeln for yourself, I published an OSM > XML file with all my changes here (~650KB): > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2408400/triangeln.osm.xml > > I genuinely think that the new layout is an improvement to the current > one. What do you all think? > > Cheers, > Leonardo. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-se mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se >
_______________________________________________ Talk-se mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
