Now you all know why I didn't post in Swedish. :-) Alright, I will double check the spelling and connect the elevator to the platform and put a building tag. I actually do have to check where that elevator goes, since I can see in the platform where the two other ones that are inside the entrance buildings go (by mistake they're unmapped in the file I posted), but I'm not sure about the one outside near the southern entrance. I'm going to take it when I pass through there again today.
On 7 August 2013 11:58, Joakim Fors <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > I've mapped most of the existing features at Triangeln (platforms, > entrancebuildings, escalators etc) and your changes look like an improvement > so go ahead. The only things I'd change are the spelling errors that Andreas > pointed out and I'd like to see the elevator near the southern entrance > connected to the platforms somehow (for routing purposes). It could also have > a building= tag of some kind. > > /Joakim > > > On 6 aug 2013, at 19:40, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (Sorry for not writing in Swedish to the list but my Swedish is probably >> much worse than your English.) >> >> Hello all, >> >> I live in Malmö and I have done some improvements on Triangeln Station >> which I believe align better with the "new" public transport feature >> approved in late 2011, but before I upload my changes I would like to >> hear the opinion from some other fellow OSMers who live nearby and know >> the station. >> >> The way Triangeln was mapped before the proposed change was that there >> were two buildings, both marked as a train station, which had the same >> name. This is a bit misleading since there are not two Triangeln >> stations; Triangeln is a single underground station that happens to have >> two separate entrances via two separate buildings. To better reflect >> reality, I mapped Triangeln as a single underground (layer=-2, same as >> the platforms) area marked as public_transport=station (and also >> railway=station for maximum compatibility) where platforms and the >> buildings are contained within. The two buildings where the entrances >> are still keep the name "Triangeln Station" but are now marked as >> building=train_station (and *not* railway=station). Within each >> building, just at the beginning of the stairs, there is a node tagged >> with railway=subway_entrance (which besides the name should be >> applicable to any underground train station) and each node has the name >> "Nörra upgången" and "Södra uppgången". >> >> All these new elements are also part of the existing "Triangeln" >> relation tagged as public_transport=stop_area. (I'm not really sure if >> the Triangeln bus stop and the Triangeln train station should really be >> part of the a single stop_area or not, but that's a separate discussion >> and I kept the existing relation where both are a single area.) >> >> If you want to see the new Triangeln for yourself, I published an OSM >> XML file with all my changes here (~650KB): >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2408400/triangeln.osm.xml >> >> I genuinely think that the new layout is an improvement to the current >> one. What do you all think? >> >> Cheers, >> Leonardo. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-se mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-se mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se _______________________________________________ Talk-se mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
